Jump to content

Cartesian fibration

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Cartesian morphism)

In mathematics, especially homotopy theory, a cartesian fibration is, roughly, a map so that every lift exists that is a final object among all lifts. For example, the forgetful functor

from the category of pairs of schemes and quasi-coherent sheaves on them is a cartesian fibration.[1] In fact, the Grothendieck construction says all cartesian fibrations are of this type; i.e., they simply forget extra data. See also: fibred category, prestack.

A right fibration between simplicial sets is an example of a cartesian fibration.

Definition

[edit]

Given a functor , a morphism in is called -cartesian if the natural map

is bijective.[2][3] Explicitly, thus, is cartesian if given

  • and

with , there exists a unique in such that .

Then is called a cartesian fibration if for each morphism of the form in D, there exists a -cartesian morphism in C such that . [4]

A morphism between cartesian fibrations over the same base S is simply a map (functor) over the base; i.e., . Given , a 2-morphism is an invertible map (map = natural transformation) such that for each object in the source of , maps to the identity map of the object under .

This way, all the cartesian fibrations over the fixed base category S determine the (2, 1)-category denoted by .

Grothendieck construction

[edit]

Given a category , the Grothendieck construction gives an equivalence of ∞-categories between and the ∞-category of prestacks on (prestacks = category-valued presheaves).[5]

Roughly, the construction goes as follows: given a cartesian fibration , we let be the map that sends each object x in C to the fiber . So, is a -valued presheaf or a prestack. Conversely, given a prestack , define the category where an object is a pair with and then let be the forgetful functor to . Then these two assignments give the claimed equivalence.

For example, if the construction is applied to the forgetful , then we get the map that sends a scheme to the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on . Conversely, is determined by such a map.

Lurie's straightening theorem generalizes the above equivalence to the equivalence between the ∞-category of cartesian fibrations over some ∞-category C and the the ∞-category of ∞-prestacks on C.[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Khan, Example 3.1.3.
  2. ^ Kerodon, Definition 5.0.0.1.
  3. ^ Khan, Definition 3.1.1.
  4. ^ Khan, Definition 3.1.2.
  5. ^ Khan, Theorem 3.1.5.
  6. ^ An introduction in Louis Martini, Cocartesian fibrations and straightening internal to an ∞-topos [arXiv:2204.00295]

Further reading

[edit]