Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

18 April 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< April 17	April 19 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Sky City 1000

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

infrastructure article proposed in 1989 and without a completion and creation date. I echo what was said in the first nomination: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball; and articles are created when they are under construction. Iban14mxl (talk) 02:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notability does not expire. Featured on Discovery Channel's Extreme Engineering (2003). 10 years earlier, an article in NewScientist (1993). Proposed ideas can be notable. There are proposed ideas to live on Mars such as Caves of Mars Project (2004), Mars Direct (1996). None of these ideas have happened, and probably never will, but we still have articles for them because they were notable ideas. -- GreenC 02:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an architect, but at first glance it is clear that the design is outdated and does not meet the construction requirements, or it could be that this project was replaced by another work. Unlike the hotel and skyscraper started in 1989 in Pyongyang, this work was not even started. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Iban14mxl (talk) 02:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kosmic (speedrunner)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I genuinely love the shit out of Kosmic's videos and would consider myself a fanboy, but WP:BEFORE demonstrates that he doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, or WP:CREATIVE. This brand-new article cites an article from UPI, which is a good source. But then the other citation is from Mashable (a dumpsterfire of a source that shouldn't confer notability to anything, although as it barely discusses Kosmic, it wouldn't anyway) about the same exact event that UPI discussed. The UPI article is 108 words in length and barely even talks about Kosmic himself (thus while being reliable and independent, it doesn't confer significant coverage). This is cut-and-dry unless my WP:BEFORE failed to uncover significant coverage from multiple reliable, independent sources. The strongest sources BEFORE turned up are occasional stories like this, but again, this is almost exclusively focused on SMB speedrunning, not Kosmic himself. As someone who loves speedruns and challenge runs and adores seeing them become mainstream, I would want to see this turned into a genuinely robust, useful article using reliable, independent sources, but I don't believe that to currently be possible because of how far short of notability guidelines he falls. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 02:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Ren

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. No coverage to meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 01:55, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Olympics, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 01:55, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vigor (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extreme lack of notability. Stub article. Actual code is just a realization of an idea from a comic strip, and not meant for actual use. Hexware (talk) 15:37, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Hexware (talk) 15:37, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are some references on the article talk page. PC Chip is probably a good source, although I can't easily find the article being referred to. Linuxticker.com ([1]) seems okay, and the Salon.com piece ([2]) might be usable even though there's no consensus on reliability at WP:SALON.COM. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Radio tekee muron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Non-notable book. SL93 (talk) 00:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Literature, and Finland. SL93 (talk) 00:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If the outcome is "delete" or "redirect" instead of "keep", the article Radio tekee murron, which inspired the name of this book, should include a mention if this book. JIP | Talk 01:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Zero sources listed. A random cookbook doesn't need an article

Thegoofhere (talk) 01:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Jalalabad

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was previously deleted following an AfD discussion, where participants deemed it non-notable. I have reviewed the current version of the article and found that the creator has added numerous references that are not relevant to the subject. It appears that the creator is attempting to showcase notability by including a large number of sources, regardless of their relevance. Due to the lack of independent, in-depth coverage, I believe the subject still does not meet the notability guidelines. I propose deletion.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 00:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Bangladesh. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 00:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I wanted to note for the record that while the first nomination was started under similar notability concerns, the resulting deletion was actually a G5 deletion because the creator of that version of the article was a sock. (I have no opinion or comment at this time on the current article.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ameba (website)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Speedy kept in the dark ages of AfD when "but Alexa ranking" was enough to justify a keep. Single independent reference, nothing RS located on a search. Caveat being that I don't read Japanese, but you'd think there would be something. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Japan. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FyaVerse

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty SEO/PR refs, other junk sources about a non-notable artist. The article lacks citations from reliable sources that provide significant, independent coverage. The subject does not appear to meet notability guidelines, as the existing references are primarily promotional or paid content. Tukšumi (talk) 00:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Bands and musicians, and Music. Tukšumi (talk) 00:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – FyaVerse is a notable reggae/dancehall artist with one consecutive HDP Music Award nomination (2025), a Billboard Argentina Hot 100 appearance, and one #1 song on Hype TV and one #10 on FiWi Choice. Notability is supported by reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novadorodney98 (talk • contribs)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jamaica-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 00:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aeropolis 2001

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A building project was conceived in 1989, but there has been no news of it since 1995. Too much time has passed, and I doubt they'll build it in the coming decades. Iban14mxl (talk) 23:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Offline} 00:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Proposed in 1989 but no target date or either beginning of construction date. It was never built, so it seems that it was just a proposal that never got beyond that. — Maile (talk) 00:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]