Talk:Crows Nest, New South Wales
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I cannot believe that CN was named AFTER the pub. Surely after the CN estate. Thortful 06:20, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Some of these geo pages are listing important businesses in the area (Winning Appliances, for example). Do you think they some should be added here? 125.255.85.74 (talk) 23:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- That article is a poor one, and I don't think adding similar businesses to this article will enhance it. --Inas66 (talk) 04:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Crows Nest, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091005235236/http://www.northsydney.nsw.gov.au/resources/documents/HW_LandGrant_Subdivision.pdf to http://www.northsydney.nsw.gov.au/resources/documents/HW_LandGrant_Subdivision.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Crows Nest, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150827020105/http://www.greekorthodox.org.au/general/aboutus/parishdirectory?parish_id=14 to http://www.greekorthodox.org.au/general/aboutus/parishdirectory?parish_id=14
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Crows Nest, New South Wales be renamed and moved to Crows Nest. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Crows Nest, New South Wales → Crows Nest – It might meet Wikipedia's primary topic criteria. Clearly most page views in terms of place: [1] although not clear of most page views: [2], another proposal I have is also to have a note at the top of the article Crows Nest, New South Wales that says "This article is a about the suburb" for the bird's nest itself, see Crow's nest". Feel free to vote however you want as this might seem controversial Servite et contribuere (talk) 02:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose, if there's a primary it's the ships lookout structure, but probably best to keep this at the Disamb page. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:18, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Randy Kryn Important note, this was just a suggestion. I am honestly staying neutral in this vote Servite et contribuere (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Servite et contribuere: if you're neutral, why did you open an RM for it? Generally that would only be advisable or necessary if you actually support the move. If you don't, and given there also appear to be good reasons why this particular move shouldn't go ahead, I suggest it be withdrawn. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 14:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Amakuru Crows Nest is tough, it could also refer to a birds nest, I was wondering to myself, I wondering to myself, does the community think it meets the Primary Topic criteria? My idea was, maybe simply Crows Nest for the suburb, and simply Crows's nest for an actual nest itself. Look, I actually believe this move will be opposed by the community, but now that it is open, I think it is better to wait for consensus, and thus I am not withdrawing it. Cheers and thank you for your telling me your concern Servite et contribuere (talk) 00:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Servite et contribuere: if you're neutral, why did you open an RM for it? Generally that would only be advisable or necessary if you actually support the move. If you don't, and given there also appear to be good reasons why this particular move shouldn't go ahead, I suggest it be withdrawn. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 14:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Randy Kryn Important note, this was just a suggestion. I am honestly staying neutral in this vote Servite et contribuere (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose, not seeing the Sydney suburb as being the primary topic over others listed on the disambiguation page. Minxlyn (talk) 02:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Australian places articles
- Low-importance Australian places articles
- WikiProject Australian places articles
- Start-Class Sydney articles
- Low-importance Sydney articles
- WikiProject Sydney articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Requested moves